Top Page & Personal
Information
|| Alternative History || Eschatology || History || Literature || Polemical Writings || Religion || Science & Cosmology || Spelling Reform || World Government ||
Archetype of the
Apocalypse:
A Jungian Study of the Book of Revelation
by Edward F.
Edinger
Edited by George R. Elder
Open Court Publishing Company,
1999
222 Pages, US$26.95
ISBN: 0-8126-9395-7
Once upon a time, there was a film
producer who said that the kind of movie he liked was one that started with an
earthquake and then built to a climax. In a similar spirit, the editor of
"Archetype of the Apocalypse" prefaces it with the warning that the "book will
challenge the reader to accept a disturbing premise: namely, that *the world as
we know it* is coming to an end in the very near future." "Archetype of the
Apocalypse" examines most of the "Book of Revelation" verse by verse, but the
basis for this prophecy is not the authority of scripture. Rather, the future is
proclaimed by the voice of the collective unconscious, as manifested in the
culture of the late 20th century and in the psychology of the author's own
patients.
Objections to this thesis
quickly present themselves. For one thing, just once I would like to hear a
prophecy about the end of the world as we don't know it. More generally, it is
hard to take any school of analytical psychology altogether seriously these
days. Nonetheless, I urge readers to suspend their disbelief for a few hours.
This is a fascinating little book, filled with provocative observations that
transcend theory. Moreover, aside from the analytical psychology, "Archetype of
the Apocalypse" is a surprisingly useful introduction to the parallel
apocalyptic texts that pepper the biblical canon and the apocrypha. "The Book of
Revelation" is in some ways irreducibly obscure, but even a passing familiarity
with its literary allusions makes it much less so.
The book's author, Edward F.
Edinger, was a noted Jungian analyst and a founder of the C.G. Jung Foundation
of New York. The series of lectures that became "Archetype of the Apocalypse"
were delivered in 1995. They were edited by George R. Elder, a Jungian-oriented
psychotherapist, who worked on the text with Dr. Edinger before the latter's
death in 1998. The result is more coherent than are most lecture compilations.
Another merit of the book is the use of classic black-and-white illustrations,
notably from William Blake and Albrecht Duerer, to help to explicate the
biblical text.
It is not surprising that a
follower of Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), the famous Swiss depth-psychologist,
should take an interest in the notion of the "apocalypse" in general and in the
"Book of Revelation" in particular. Jung himself viewed history in much the way
Hegel did: it is a process that began in unselfconscious animality, passes
through ages of division and strife, and will culminate when mankind finally
understands itself and the world. Jung posited that this process was mirrored in
the development of the psychology of individuals as they matured through life.
The goal of personal psychic development was the integration of the personal,
conscious ego with the Self. Jung held that the Self is "transpersonal." It
contains an individual's memories, drives and desires, but also, in some way,
those of the individual's culture, and even of the human race as a whole. The
Self is the repository of Jung's famous "collective unconscious." The purpose of
Jungian psychoanalysis is to bring this collective unconscious to consciousness.
The patient will then understand himself as he really is, which includes some
appreciation of how the Self surpasses the ego's understanding.
Jung gave this process of
integrating the psyche the name "individuation," but did not claim to have
invented it. Cultures throughout history have aided integration by generating
symbols, or archetypes, that represent features of the collective unconscious,
or stages in the process of individuation. These archetypes are the common
possession of the whole species; they are why similar myths appear in distant
societies that have never had even indirect contact.
A symbol system that
particularly interested Jung was alchemy. He believed that the transformations
that occurred in the alchemists' alembic, or that they believed to be taking
place there, reflected the processes taking place in the alchemists' own
psyches. The real goal of alchemy was not to make ordinary gold, but "the
philosopher's stone," the symbol of the individuated Self. He also believed that
the stages in the alchemical processes corresponded to the great phases in the
cultural history of the world. The human race, therefore, went through a pattern
of crises and discoveries similar to that experienced by patients undergoing
analysis.
Jung discussed these topics
chiefly in his books "Mysterium Coniunctionis" and "Aion," and Dr. Edinger
applies aspects of the analysis in those books here. (There is a brief
discussion of Jung's alchemical model of history in my own book, The Perennial Apocalypse.)
Another symbol system that reflects the process of individuation is to be found
in apocalyptic literature. While writing of this type is not confined to the
biblical tradition, it was chiefly biblical apocalyptic literature (literally,
the literature of "revelation") that interested Jung. He discussed the matter at
length in "Answer to Job." Dr. Edinger insists that "Answer to Job" is of great
significance for the future of the world, and so "Archetype of the Apocalypse"
is largely a systematic application of insights from that book.
For Dr. Edinger, as for the
Jungians in general, the personal is the historical. Regarding the notion of the
end of the age, he says: "[T]he essential psychological meaning of the
Apocalypse [is] the coming into consciousness of the Self -- and anxiety is a
harbinger of that phenomenon." While archetypes are, by their nature, ubiquitous
in time and space, the fact is that some archetypes are more relevant to some
times and places than to others. That was why he delivered these lectures when
he did. "I think it is evident to perceptive people," he says, "that the
Apocalypse archetype is now highly activated in the collective psyche and is
living itself out in human history."
This roiling of the
transpersonal is not arbitrary; it reflects events in the outer world, just as
it causes them: "One way or another, the world is going to be made a single
whole entity. But it will be unified either in mutual mass destruction or by
means of mutual human consciousness." The choice between the unity of
fulfillment and the unity of death turns, however, on the way that individuals
manage their own psychic lives. The choice thus really depends on whether we can
distinguish the real nature of events in the outer world from our own psychic
projections. We have not been doing such a good job so far, with the result that
psychic processes are being externalized:
"The Self is coming, and the phenomena that ought to be *experienced consciously and integrated by the individual in the course of the individuation process* are occurring unconsciously and collectively in society as a whole."
The idea that inner conflict
can be projected onto external enemies is not particularly mysterious. In fact,
this is one context in which the Jungian terminology is helpful:
"The Self is projected into one's national community and is the basis of national and ethnic identity....Collective exteriorized manifestations of the Self lead to the constellation of the opposites in the Self; and those opposites generate conflict."
Edinger was very interested in
messianic figures, who have a strange way of being "saviors and beasts" at the
same time. According to Edinger, Captain Ahab in "Moby Dick" is a literary
example of an ego that has activated an archetype and been devoured by it: that
is what makes Ahab such a compelling character. Jung once made much the same
assessment of Hitler after seeing him in person. "Archetype of the Apocalypse"
contains two appendices, one dealing with David Koresh of the Branch Davidians,
the other with Bonnie Nettles and Marshall Applewhite of Heaven's Gate. About
David Koresh the author says:
"This man represents...a new phenomenon that is quasi-criminal, quasi psychotic due to possession by the archetype of the Apocalypse. And that means, since a human ego has been bypassed, that the possessed individual is functioning `inhumanly.' It is by that very fact a psychological state that generates charisma with tremendous energy in it!"
To some extent, the activation
of certain archetypes at certain points in history is foreordained. The Jungian
system assumes that there is an entelechy, a natural organic destiny, in the
evolution of the mind of the race. The impending apocalyptic era, according to
Edinger, will finish up the process that was advanced but not completed around
the beginning of the Christian era. The psychic struggle that produced the
classic apocalyptic literature, and that eventuated in the Christianization of
late antiquity, had its own task:
"[T]he vast, collective, individuation process which lies behind history required at the beginning of our era the creation of a powerful `spiritual' counterpole to the `instinctual' degradation and excesses that accompanied the decadence of the ancient world."
Thus, the drama in the "Book of
Revelation" is very much about sorting out the good from the bad and simply
rejecting the latter. There are hints of apocatastasis, of the renewal of all
things, in the "Book of Revelation." This is particularly the case with the
vision at the very end of the Bible of the New Jerusalem, the perfectly
integrated city where the human race at last has access to the Tree of Life that
was withheld from it in Genesis. This image of wholeness, however, overlays a
text about separation and judgment. At the time, though, this was just what the
world needed:
"[T]he meaning of this double-layered structure is this: at certain levels of development a decisive *separatio* is, in fact, a state of wholeness -- even if not what we, with modern psyches, would define as a state of wholeness."
The coming apocalyptic age,
however, must move on to a higher level of integration. Otherwise, the human
race will destroy itself in pursuit of a phantom Enemy. This time, the shadow
must be assimilated. This will require, frankly, a spiritual revolution:
"The image of a totally good God -- albeit pestered by a dissociated evil Satan -- is no longer viable. Instead, the new God-image coming into conscious realization is that of a paradoxical union of opposites; and with it comes a healing of the metaphysical split that has characterized the entire Christian aeon."
We may note in passing that
there are formal reasons why only a totally good God is conceivable, much less
"viable," but that is another story. In any case, Jung was quite capable of
giving some specifics about the spiritual regime that would follow Christianity,
even down to the schedule for its appearance. When told of a dream about a vast
temple in the early stages of construction, Jung said (as Edinger quotes):
"Yes, you know, that is the temple we all build on. We don't know the [other people in the dream] because, believe me, they build in India and China and in Russia and all over the world. This is the new religion. You know how long it will take until it is built?...about six hundred years."
Edinger himself suggests this
about the theology, or possibly anthroposophy, of the post-apocalyptic age:
"God is going to incarnate in humanity as a whole and in that incarnated form offer himself as a self-sacrifice to bring about his own transformation, just as he did with the individual Christ."
Jung's comment was probably
made around the middle of the 20th century, so the time of fulfillment would
appear to be sometime in the 26th century. That puts it about 500 years after
the year 2000, the conventional length of a world age. Jung, perhaps, conceived
himself to be living in a time like the intertestamental period, when classic
apocalyptic was born, and it is not too much to say that he believed himself to
be planting the seed of a new revelation. At least in Edinger's estimation,
however, the new revelation would not fulfill but defang the old:
"By understanding the psychological reality that stands behind them, we are `impoverishing' the scriptures of their content or `relieving' them of the weight of their content...while at the same time augmenting the weight and magnitude of the psyche. That operation is going on in this book."
The notion of deliberately
"impoverishing the scriptures" will sound a bit diabolical to many readers;
certainly it does to me. For that matter, so is Edinger's transpersonal
Messianic Age. In fact, I might be outraged by all this, were it not for the
fact that true diabolism is beyond the reach of Jung's system. The attempt to
reduce religion to collective psychology is not so manifestly foolish as trying
to reduce it to, say, neurobiology. Still, it is a form of reductionism
nonetheless, an attempt to get a very big thing into a smaller thing. It's not
going to work, so there is no point in getting upset about it.
Moreover, though the insight is
beyond the power of his philosophy to understand, Edinger has succeeded in
highlighting the provisional nature of Christian eschatology. In the old
formula, the salvation of the world is "already but not yet." This is reflected
not least in the text of "Revelation." He is right: the images don't quite gel,
however much they may sometimes illuminate history. The notion of a
schizophrenic God was one of Jung's poorer notions, and it boobytrapped the
whole Jungian enterprise: Jungians are always in danger of confusing the divine
with the merely uncanny. On the other hand, history really is both progressive
and uncanny, just as Jung imagined it to be. "Archetype of the Apocalypse"
illustrates this paradox very well.
Copyright © 2001 by John J. Reilly